We don't have to fill all three bullets if we don't have to.  IMO, the only 
thing blocking graduation is growing the community.   If Olingo had more strong 
contributors I'm sure that documentation and a second release would get in the 
way of graduation.

With that said, we should provide that succinct transparency in our report to 
the board and only mention growing the community.

BTW, great report!


Regards,
Alan


On Dec 30, 2013, at 12:39 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi -
> 
> I think that the goals towards graduation section should be re-ordered.
> 
>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>> 
>>  1. Make the second release which addresses most of the Jira Issues
>>     opened since the last release
>> 
>>  2. Work on documentation
>> 
>>  3. Grow community
>> 
> 
> IMHO - The order should be:
> 
> 1. Grow community.
> 2. Make a second release.
> 3. Work on documentation.
> 
> If the community feels that the second release and documentation will 
> increase the chances for growing the community then these are sub-goals. The 
> first podling release already satisfies the Apache release requirement.
> 
> Does this make sense?
> 
> Having Francesco joining is already a very good sign of growth!
> 
> Regards,
> Dave
> 
> On Dec 30, 2013, at 7:27 AM, Huesken, Jens wrote:
> 
>> Hi Francesco,
>> I like your proposal to send a draft version to dev@ before finally 
>> submitting it to the wiki.
>> 
>> @all:
>> On open point I see is that we should discuss who feels responsible for 
>> doing the reports in future. WDYT?
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Jens.
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:[email protected]] 
>> Sent: Montag, 30. Dezember 2013 14:44
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [OLINGO] RE: January 2014 Incubator report timeline
>> 
>> On 30/12/2013 14:31, Huesken, Jens wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>> since the last three reports for Olingo were done in the same way I assumed 
>>> that writing the report and informing the mailing list is ok for everyone.
>>> The deadline for the report is January 1st, so I propose that everyone who 
>>> has feedback for the report speaks up before the deadline.
>>> If there is no feedback I assume that everyone is ok with the report (lazy 
>>> consensus).
>> 
>> Lazy consensus is generally fine for some aspects, but in case of a 
>> podling that will eventually show it is "ASF-mature" enough for 
>> graduation, I would encourage as much discussion as possible.
>> 
>> Anyway, I would say that the report you've submitted is just fine and 
>> that we can think to action starting from next report.
>> 
>>> @Francesco: Thanks for pointing this out. Any proposal how we should do 
>>> that for future reports? How do other projects deal with that? Maybe you 
>>> have some more experience?
>> 
>> In Cocoon and Syncope (especially the latter that have gone through 
>> incubation in 2012, so recently enough) usually someone from PMC - which 
>> is most of time the PMC chair - prepares a draft report and send it via 
>> e-mail with a subject line like as "[DRAFT] Report Apache XXX January 
>> 2014", leaving some time (usual 72 hours are fine) open for discussion.
>> If no one objects, the report is then submitted.
>> Naturally, discussion can actually modify the text of the report being sent.
>> 
>> Holding such discussion at dev@ will help matching requirements 
>> expressed by [1] and finally speed up the incubation process.
>> 
>> HTH
>> Regards.
>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Francesco Chicchiriccò [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Montag, 30. Dezember 2013 11:26
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: [OLINGO] RE: January 2014 Incubator report timeline
>>> 
>>> On 30/12/2013 11:21, Huesken, Jens wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>> the report for Apache Olingo is ready and can be accessed via the wiki.
>>>> 
>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/January2014
>>> Hi all,
>>> aren't we supposed to discuss and approve the report before (see [1])?
>>> 
>>> Regards.
>>> 
>>> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/guides/ppmc.html#Incubator+ASF+Board+Reports
>> 
>> -- 
>> Francesco Chicchiriccò
>> 
>> Tirasa - Open Source Excellence
>> http://www.tirasa.net/
>> 
>> ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
>> http://people.apache.org/~ilgrosso/
>> 
> 

Reply via email to