ACK On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote:
> Once avro_rpc is stable, I suggest we rename the branch 2.0-dev or similar > then branch the branch to uprade solr and lucene outside of that scope so > we don't destroy the semi working avro upgrades ;) > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> > wrote: > > > Coolio! > > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > >> Yes I was just telling Paul R. the other day we need to do > >> this, or we’re DOA. I’ve first hand seen the scalability > >> issues with Big Translate and DRAT using the old Lucene > >> library. Let’s get it fixed in 2.x. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Chris > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: > >> > >> >Just throwing this one out there as we're making a bunch of breaking > >> >changes in 2.0. > >> > > >> >Is it worth upgrading Lucene and Solr versions within OODT? > >> > > >> >My feeling is that they are both pretty old and whilst we're making > life > >> >hard for everyone we might as well go the whole hog and drag them into > >> the > >> >21st century, but I'm interested in others opinions. > >> > > >> >Chris you have a much better understand about those things than myself. > >> > > >> >Tom > >> > >> > > > -- *Lewis*
