awesome!!! Please backport to 1.x :)
On 7/8/16, 3:01 PM, "Tom Barber" <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: >There you go, running commentary over. The filemanager test suite now >passes on Lucene 6, I'll fix up the rest next week. > >Tom > >On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: > >> Better than I thought actually: >> >> Tests in error: >> TestLuceneQueryCliAction.testClientTransTrueAndFlatProduct:78 » >> CmdLineAction ... >> TestFileManagerCli.testLuceneQuery:350 » Runtime >> org.apache.oodt.cas.cli.excep... >> >> Tests run: 221, Failures: 1, Errors: 2, Skipped: 0 >> >> The failure is actually one Avro. So only 2 failing on lucene 6 in the FM. >> >> On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> >> wrote: >> >>> Just FYI: >>> >>> Doesn't work yet, but I've pushed a lucene branch which is based on 2.0 >>> and upgrades lucene to 6.1.0. LuceneCatalog in filemanager has been 75% >>> (guess) converted and tests are half passing. >>> >>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < >>> lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> ACK >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> > Once avro_rpc is stable, I suggest we rename the branch 2.0-dev or >>>> similar >>>> > then branch the branch to uprade solr and lucene outside of that scope >>>> so >>>> > we don't destroy the semi working avro upgrades ;) >>>> > >>>> > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>> > > Coolio! >>>> > > >>>> > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> >>>> > > wrote: >>>> > > >>>> > >> Yes I was just telling Paul R. the other day we need to do >>>> > >> this, or we’re DOA. I’ve first hand seen the scalability >>>> > >> issues with Big Translate and DRAT using the old Lucene >>>> > >> library. Let’s get it fixed in 2.x. >>>> > >> >>>> > >> Cheers, >>>> > >> Chris >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > >> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >Just throwing this one out there as we're making a bunch of >>>> breaking >>>> > >> >changes in 2.0. >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> >Is it worth upgrading Lucene and Solr versions within OODT? >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> >My feeling is that they are both pretty old and whilst we're making >>>> > life >>>> > >> >hard for everyone we might as well go the whole hog and drag them >>>> into >>>> > >> the >>>> > >> >21st century, but I'm interested in others opinions. >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> >Chris you have a much better understand about those things than >>>> myself. >>>> > >> > >>>> > >> >Tom >>>> > >> >>>> > >> >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Lewis* >>>> >>> >>> >>
