Just FYI: Doesn't work yet, but I've pushed a lucene branch which is based on 2.0 and upgrades lucene to 6.1.0. LuceneCatalog in filemanager has been 75% (guess) converted and tests are half passing.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:30 PM, Lewis John Mcgibbney < lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com> wrote: > ACK > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> > wrote: > > > Once avro_rpc is stable, I suggest we rename the branch 2.0-dev or > similar > > then branch the branch to uprade solr and lucene outside of that scope so > > we don't destroy the semi working avro upgrades ;) > > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> > > wrote: > > > > > Coolio! > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 6, 2016 at 4:54 PM, Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Yes I was just telling Paul R. the other day we need to do > > >> this, or we’re DOA. I’ve first hand seen the scalability > > >> issues with Big Translate and DRAT using the old Lucene > > >> library. Let’s get it fixed in 2.x. > > >> > > >> Cheers, > > >> Chris > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 7/6/16, 8:51 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: > > >> > > >> >Just throwing this one out there as we're making a bunch of breaking > > >> >changes in 2.0. > > >> > > > >> >Is it worth upgrading Lucene and Solr versions within OODT? > > >> > > > >> >My feeling is that they are both pretty old and whilst we're making > > life > > >> >hard for everyone we might as well go the whole hog and drag them > into > > >> the > > >> >21st century, but I'm interested in others opinions. > > >> > > > >> >Chris you have a much better understand about those things than > myself. > > >> > > > >> >Tom > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > > > -- > *Lewis* >
