I would get some more feedback, 48-72 hours, then go ahead and switch if there are no objections.
note subject line change. — Chris Mattmann chris.mattm...@gmail.com On 7/15/16, 10:17 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: >Jenkins won't compile with anything older. so, yeah > >On 15 Jul 2016 17:46, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" < >chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > >> are you saying we should switch to Java8? >> >> If so, I’m fine with that. >> >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. >> Chief Architect >> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) >> NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA >> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 >> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov >> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) >> Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department >> University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA >> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On 7/15/16, 7:14 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: >> >> >Lucene 6.1.0 seems to be min Java 8, which makes it our minimum version. >> >Personally I don't have a problem with it 6 and 7 are both EOL. If someone >> >complains vehemently we'll have to downgrade the lucene upgrade. >>
