Were the Javadoc issues fixed or are we currently working around? On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Chris Mattmann <chris.mattm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep, I had to fix this in 1.1 (master) - I had the same problem Val. > It had to do with the XDoclet being on by default there with strict > javadoc interpretation. Try updating to 1.1 master - it fixes this. > > ā > Chris Mattmann > chris.mattm...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > On 7/15/16, 10:52 AM, "Mallder, Valerie" <valerie.mall...@jhuapl.edu> > wrote: > > >When I try to build OODT 1.0 with Java 8 (specifically jdk1.8.0_66) my > build fails while building the Common Utilities. I'm not a java or maven > guru so I can't tell if there is something missing on my system that I need > installed. The error has to do with JavaDocs ?? > > > >[ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc > (attach-javadocs) on project oodt-commons: An error has occurred in > JavaDocs report generation: > > > >Here's a portion of the errors that get logged > > > >[INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >434 [INFO] Reactor Summary: > >435 [INFO] > >436 [INFO] OODT Core ......................................... SUCCESS > [3.468s] > >437 [INFO] Common Utilities .................................. FAILURE > [20.809s] > >438 [INFO] CAS Command Line Interface ........................ SKIPPED > >439 [INFO] Process Control System Input Data Package ......... SKIPPED > >440 [INFO] Catalog and Archive Service Generic Multi-valued Metadata > Container SKIPPED > >441 [INFO] CAS Protocol ...................................... SKIPPED > >442 [INFO] CAS Protocol FTP Implementation ................... SKIPPED > >443 [INFO] CAS Protocol HTTP Implementation .................. SKIPPED > >444 [INFO] CAS Protocol IMAPS Implementation ................. SKIPPED > >445 [INFO] CAS Protocol SFTP Implementation .................. SKIPPED > >446 [INFO] Query Expression .................................. SKIPPED > >447 [INFO] OODT Single Sign On Security Package .............. SKIPPED > >448 [INFO] Catalog and Archive File Management Component ..... SKIPPED > >449 [INFO] OODT CAS Virtual Catalog and Integration Service. . SKIPPED > >450 [INFO] Catalog and Archive Resource Management Component . SKIPPED > >451 [INFO] Catalog and Archive Workflow Management Component . SKIPPED > >452 [INFO] Catalog and Archive Crawling Framework ............ SKIPPED > >453 [INFO] CAS Curation Web Services ......................... SKIPPED > >454 [INFO] Process Control System Core Package ............... SKIPPED > >455 [INFO] OODT Wicket Web Components ........................ SKIPPED > >456 [INFO] CAS Curation Interface ............................ SKIPPED > >457 [INFO] CAS PGE Adaptor Framework ......................... SKIPPED > >458 [INFO] CAS Installer Maven Mojo .......................... SKIPPED > >463 [INFO] Product Service ................................... SKIPPED > >464 [INFO] Profile Service ................................... SKIPPED > >467 [INFO] Apache OODT Configurable OPeNDAP Profile Server ... SKIPPED > >468 [INFO] CAS File Manager Browser Web App .................. SKIPPED > >471 [INFO] Catalog and Archive File Management Browser ....... SKIPPED > >472 [INFO] Catalog and Archive Workflow Management GUI Editor SKIPPED > >475 [INFO] Apache OODT ....................................... SKIPPED > >476 [INFO] > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >479 [INFO] Total time: 24.966s > >480 [INFO] Finished at: Fri Jul 15 13:33:55 EDT 2016 > >483 [ERROR] Failed to execute goal > org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc > (attach-javadocs) on project oodt-commons: An error has occurred in > JavaDocs report generation: > >484 [ERROR] Exit code: 1 - > /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/Base64.java:213: > warning: no @throws for java.io.IOException485 [ERROR] public static > void main(String[] argv) throws IOException { > >486 [ERROR] ^ > >487 [ERROR] > /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/DOMParser.java:97: > error: exception not t hrown: org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException488 > [ERROR] * @exception SAXNotRecognizedException If the requested feature is > >489 [ERROR] ^ > >490 [ERROR] > /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/DOMParser.java:116: > error: exception not thrown: org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException491 > [ERROR] * @exception SAXNotRecognizedException If the requested feature is > >492 [ERROR] ^ > >493 [ERROR] > /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/DOMParser.java:119: > warning: no @throws f or org.xml.sax.SAXNotSupportedException494 [ERROR] > public boolean getFeature(String featureId) throws SAXNotSupportedException > { > >495 [ERROR] ^ > >496 [ERROR] > /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/DOMParser.java:132: > error: exception not thrown: org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException497 > [ERROR] * @exception SAXNotRecognizedException If the requested property is > >498 [ERROR] ^ > >499 [ERROR] > /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/DOMParser.java:151: > error: exception not thrown: org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:chris.mattm...@gmail.com] > >Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 1:24 PM > >To: dev@oodt.apache.org > >Subject: [DISCUSS] Java 8 Min Version > > > >I would get some more feedback, 48-72 hours, then go ahead and switch if > there are no objections. > > > >note subject line change. > > > >ā > >Chris Mattmann > >chris.mattm...@gmail.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >On 7/15/16, 10:17 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: > > > >>Jenkins won't compile with anything older. so, yeah > >> > >>On 15 Jul 2016 17:46, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" < > >>chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote: > >> > >>> are you saying we should switch to Java8? > >>> > >>> If so, Iām fine with that. > >>> > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > >>> Chief Architect > >>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet > >>> Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > >>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > >>> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov > >>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS) Adjunct > >>> Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of > >>> Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > >>> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/ > >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On 7/15/16, 7:14 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: > >>> > >>> >Lucene 6.1.0 seems to be min Java 8, which makes it our minimum > version. > >>> >Personally I don't have a problem with it 6 and 7 are both EOL. If > >>> >someone complains vehemently we'll have to downgrade the lucene > upgrade. > >>> > > > > -- *Lewis*