Cool I will do.
I have been doing this for a bunch of codebases recently... so one more
grueling effort on the OODT codebase will not hurt.
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Chris Mattmann <chris.mattm...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> hey Lewis, they are being worked around. If you want to take a look, remove
> the -Xdoclint that I added in your core/pom.xml and see what errors come.
>
> —
> Chris Mattmann
> chris.mattm...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 7/15/16, 2:19 PM, "Lewis John Mcgibbney" <lewis.mcgibb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Were the Javadoc issues fixed or are we currently working around?
> >
> >On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:53 AM, Chris Mattmann <
> chris.mattm...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Yep, I had to fix this in 1.1 (master) - I had the same problem Val.
> >> It had to do with the XDoclet being on by default there with strict
> >> javadoc interpretation. Try updating to 1.1 master - it fixes this.
> >>
> >> —
> >> Chris Mattmann
> >> chris.mattm...@gmail.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 7/15/16, 10:52 AM, "Mallder, Valerie" <valerie.mall...@jhuapl.edu>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >When I try to build OODT 1.0 with Java 8 (specifically jdk1.8.0_66) my
> >> build fails while building the Common Utilities. I'm not a java or
> maven
> >> guru so I can't tell if there is something missing on my system that I
> need
> >> installed. The error has to do with JavaDocs ??
> >> >
> >> >[ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc
> >> (attach-javadocs) on project oodt-commons: An error has occurred in
> >> JavaDocs report generation:
> >> >
> >> >Here's a portion of the errors that get logged
> >> >
> >> >[INFO]
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >434 [INFO] Reactor Summary:
> >> >435 [INFO]
> >> >436 [INFO] OODT Core ......................................... SUCCESS
> >> [3.468s]
> >> >437 [INFO] Common Utilities .................................. FAILURE
> >> [20.809s]
> >> >438 [INFO] CAS Command Line Interface ........................ SKIPPED
> >> >439 [INFO] Process Control System Input Data Package ......... SKIPPED
> >> >440 [INFO] Catalog and Archive Service Generic Multi-valued Metadata
> >> Container SKIPPED
> >> >441 [INFO] CAS Protocol ...................................... SKIPPED
> >> >442 [INFO] CAS Protocol FTP Implementation ................... SKIPPED
> >> >443 [INFO] CAS Protocol HTTP Implementation .................. SKIPPED
> >> >444 [INFO] CAS Protocol IMAPS Implementation ................. SKIPPED
> >> >445 [INFO] CAS Protocol SFTP Implementation .................. SKIPPED
> >> >446 [INFO] Query Expression .................................. SKIPPED
> >> >447 [INFO] OODT Single Sign On Security Package .............. SKIPPED
> >> >448 [INFO] Catalog and Archive File Management Component ..... SKIPPED
> >> >449 [INFO] OODT CAS Virtual Catalog and Integration Service. . SKIPPED
> >> >450 [INFO] Catalog and Archive Resource Management Component . SKIPPED
> >> >451 [INFO] Catalog and Archive Workflow Management Component . SKIPPED
> >> >452 [INFO] Catalog and Archive Crawling Framework ............ SKIPPED
> >> >453 [INFO] CAS Curation Web Services ......................... SKIPPED
> >> >454 [INFO] Process Control System Core Package ............... SKIPPED
> >> >455 [INFO] OODT Wicket Web Components ........................ SKIPPED
> >> >456 [INFO] CAS Curation Interface ............................ SKIPPED
> >> >457 [INFO] CAS PGE Adaptor Framework ......................... SKIPPED
> >> >458 [INFO] CAS Installer Maven Mojo .......................... SKIPPED
> >> >463 [INFO] Product Service ................................... SKIPPED
> >> >464 [INFO] Profile Service ................................... SKIPPED
> >> >467 [INFO] Apache OODT Configurable OPeNDAP Profile Server ... SKIPPED
> >> >468 [INFO] CAS File Manager Browser Web App .................. SKIPPED
> >> >471 [INFO] Catalog and Archive File Management Browser ....... SKIPPED
> >> >472 [INFO] Catalog and Archive Workflow Management GUI Editor SKIPPED
> >> >475 [INFO] Apache OODT ....................................... SKIPPED
> >> >476 [INFO]
> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >479 [INFO] Total time: 24.966s
> >> >480 [INFO] Finished at: Fri Jul 15 13:33:55 EDT 2016
> >> >483 [ERROR] Failed to execute goal
> >> org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-javadoc-plugin:2.10.3:javadoc
> >> (attach-javadocs) on project oodt-commons: An error has occurred in
> >> JavaDocs report generation:
> >> >484 [ERROR] Exit code: 1 -
> >>
> /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/Base64.java:213:
> >> warning: no @throws for java.io.IOException485 [ERROR] public static
> >> void main(String[] argv) throws IOException {
> >> >486 [ERROR] ^
> >> >487 [ERROR]
> >>
> /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/DOMParser.java:97:
> >> error: exception not t hrown:
> org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException488
> >> [ERROR] * @exception SAXNotRecognizedException If the requested feature
> is
> >> >489 [ERROR] ^
> >> >490 [ERROR]
> >>
> /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/DOMParser.java:116:
> >> error: exception not thrown:
> org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException491
> >> [ERROR] * @exception SAXNotRecognizedException If the requested feature
> is
> >> >492 [ERROR] ^
> >> >493 [ERROR]
> >>
> /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/DOMParser.java:119:
> >> warning: no @throws f or org.xml.sax.SAXNotSupportedException494
> [ERROR]
> >> public boolean getFeature(String featureId) throws
> SAXNotSupportedException
> >> {
> >> >495 [ERROR] ^
> >> >496 [ERROR]
> >>
> /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/DOMParser.java:132:
> >> error: exception not thrown:
> org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException497
> >> [ERROR] * @exception SAXNotRecognizedException If the requested
> property is
> >> >498 [ERROR] ^
> >> >499 [ERROR]
> >>
> /project/oodt/dev/oodt/oodt-1.0/commons/src/main/java/org/apache/oodt/commons/util/DOMParser.java:151:
> >> error: exception not thrown: org.xml.sax.SAXNotRecognizedException
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >-----Original Message-----
> >> >From: Chris Mattmann [mailto:chris.mattm...@gmail.com]
> >> >Sent: Friday, July 15, 2016 1:24 PM
> >> >To: dev@oodt.apache.org
> >> >Subject: [DISCUSS] Java 8 Min Version
> >> >
> >> >I would get some more feedback, 48-72 hours, then go ahead and switch
> if
> >> there are no objections.
> >> >
> >> >note subject line change.
> >> >
> >> >—
> >> >Chris Mattmann
> >> >chris.mattm...@gmail.com
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On 7/15/16, 10:17 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>Jenkins won't compile with anything older. so, yeah
> >> >>
> >> >>On 15 Jul 2016 17:46, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" <
> >> >>chris.a.mattm...@jpl.nasa.gov> wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>> are you saying we should switch to Java8?
> >> >>>
> >> >>> If so, I’m fine with that.
> >> >>>
> >> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >>> Chris Mattmann, Ph.D.
> >> >>> Chief Architect
> >> >>> Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) NASA Jet
> >> >>> Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
> >> >>> Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527
> >> >>> Email: chris.a.mattm...@nasa.gov
> >> >>> WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/
> >> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >>> Director, Information Retrieval and Data Science Group (IRDS)
> Adjunct
> >> >>> Associate Professor, Computer Science Department University of
> >> >>> Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA
> >> >>> WWW: http://irds.usc.edu/
> >> >>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>>
> >> >>> On 7/15/16, 7:14 AM, "Tom Barber" <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> >Lucene 6.1.0 seems to be min Java 8, which makes it our minimum
> >> version.
> >> >>> >Personally I don't have a problem with it 6 and 7 are both EOL. If
> >> >>> >someone complains vehemently we'll have to downgrade the lucene
> >> upgrade.
> >> >>>
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >--
> >*Lewis*
>
>
--
*Lewis*
