Thanks Chris!
I imported the KEYS but I still get
gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key that's not in
the KEYS file?
--k
Chris Mattmann wrote:
KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (
On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly"<ke...@apache.org> wrote:
Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam folder.
Here goes:
MD5: ✓
SHA1: ✓
Python tests: ✓
Java tests: ✓
Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release dir?
Take care
--k
> Chris Mattmann<mailto:mattm...@apache.org>
> 2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
> Ping (
>
> Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s kind
> of needed for DRAT.
> We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really love
> to release this. Thanks.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"<mattm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
>
>
> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1
> release. The
>
> source code is at:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
>
>
>
> For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file for
> details on
>
> release contents and latest changes. The release was made using the OODT
>
> release process, documented on the Wiki here:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
>
>
>
> The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:
>
> https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/
>
>
>
> A staged Maven repository is available at:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/
>
>
>
> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The vote
is
>
> open for at least the next 72 hours.
>
>
>
> Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to check the
>
> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The vote
passes
>
> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
>
>
>
> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1
>
>
>
> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
> Chris
>
>
>
> P.S. Here is my +1.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
