Thanks Sean, appreciate it. Do you know the magic command to do that
revocation? (
On 12/20/17, 9:14 AM, "Sean Kelly" <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
Chris:
This time I get:
gpg: Good signature from "Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>"
So I am now +1 to release!
Thanks Chris!
--k
PS: You might want to revoke your two older keys and make FD01FEDB the
go-to.
Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Can you try now – I updated with the KEYS file from Master that has my
new KEY. For whatever
> reason it didn’t make it into the tag, which I think is fine, since
master always has the latest
> and greatest.
>
>
>
> On 12/20/17, 8:58 AM, "Sean Kelly"<ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks Chris!
>
> I imported the KEYS but I still get
>
> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>
> Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key that's not
in
> the KEYS file?
>
> --k
>
> Chris Mattmann wrote:
> > KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? (
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly"<ke...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my
spam folder.
> >
> > Here goes:
> >
> > MD5: ✓
> > SHA1: ✓
> > Python tests: ✓
> > Java tests: ✓
> > Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
> >
> > Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the
release dir?
> >
> > Take care
> > --k
> > > Chris Mattmann<mailto:mattm...@apache.org>
> > > 2017-12-19 at 8.50 p
> > > Ping (
> > >
> > > Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release
out? It’s kind
> > > of needed for DRAT.
> > > We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would
really love
> > > to release this. Thanks.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris
Mattmann"<mattm...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Folks,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache
OODT 1.2.1
> > > release. The
> > >
> > > source code is at:
> > >
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > For more detailed information, see the included
CHANGES.txt file for
> > > details on
> > >
> > > release contents and latest changes. The release was
made using the OODT
> > >
> > > release process, documented on the Wiki here:
> > >
> > >
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at:
> > >
> > > https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > A staged Maven repository is available at:
> > >
> > >
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT
1.2.1. The vote is
> > >
> > > open for at least the next 72 hours.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are
welcome to check the
> > >
> > > release candidate and voice their approval or
disapproval. The vote passes
> > >
> > > if at least three binding +1 votes are cast.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because...
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Chris
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > P.S. Here is my +1.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
