The vote kinda already passed let’s just roll a new 1.2.2 give me 24hr to finish please
Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2018, at 7:14 PM, Tom Barber <tom.bar...@meteorite.bi> wrote: > > Okay, I'm digging this one back up. > > I'm changing my vote to -1 because of OODT-968 which causes data loss. > > I fixed it a few weeks ago, so what I propose is that we can this vote, and > I'll roll a 1.2.1 RC2 tomorrow or Saturday and reopen the vote with that > included. > > Tom > >> On 21/12/17 18:12, lewis john mcgibbney wrote: >> +1 current state of RC is good. >> Usual checks carried out. >> Thanks for pushing Chris >> >>> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 01:04 BW <w...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Trying to make up for my missed vote. ;) >>> >>>> On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 9:38 AM Sean Kelly <ke...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> BW is too fast for me! ^_^ >>>> >>>> Take care >>>> --k >>>> >>>> Sean Kelly wrote: >>>>> Chris: >>>>> >>>>> This time I get: >>>>> >>>>> gpg: Good signature from "Chris Mattmann <mattm...@apache.org>" >>>>> >>>>> So I am now +1 to release! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks Chris! >>>>> --k >>>>> >>>>> PS: You might want to revoke your two older keys and make FD01FEDB the >>>>> go-to. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Chris Mattmann wrote: >>>>>> Can you try now – I updated with the KEYS file from Master that has my >>>>>> new KEY. For whatever >>>>>> reason it didn’t make it into the tag, which I think is fine, since >>>>>> master always has the latest >>>>>> and greatest. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 12/20/17, 8:58 AM, "Sean Kelly"<ke...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Chris! >>>>>> >>>>>> I imported the KEYS but I still get >>>>>> >>>>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key >>>>>> >>>>>> Is it possible you signed this with a newly generated key that's not >>> in >>>>>> the KEYS file? >>>>>> >>>>>> --k >>>>>> >>>>>> Chris Mattmann wrote: >>>>>>> KEYS file added! ( do I have your +1? ( >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 12/20/17, 8:38 AM, "Sean Kelly"<ke...@apache.org> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Strangely this (and the release announcement) ended up in my spam >>>>>> folder. >>>>>>> Here goes: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> MD5: ✓ >>>>>>> SHA1: ✓ >>>>>>> Python tests: ✓ >>>>>>> Java tests: ✓ >>>>>>> Signature: gpg: Can't check signature: No public key >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Don't we also put a convenience copy of the KEYS file in the release >>>>>> dir? >>>>>>> Take care >>>>>>> --k >>>>>>>> Chris Mattmann<mailto:mattm...@apache.org> >>>>>>>> 2017-12-19 at 8.50 p >>>>>>>> Ping ( >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Can I get 2 more VOTEs here so I can push this release out? It’s >>>> kind >>>>>>>> of needed for DRAT. >>>>>>>> We can release a 1.2.2 with Tom’s patch later, but would really >>> love >>>>>>>> to release this. Thanks. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Cheers, >>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 11/12/17, 9:53 AM, "Chris Mattmann"<mattm...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi Folks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I have posted a 1st release candidate for the Apache OODT 1.2.1 >>>>>>>> release. The >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> source code is at: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/oodt/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> For more detailed information, see the included CHANGES.txt file >>> for >>>>>>>> details on >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> release contents and latest changes. The release was made using >>>>>> the OODT >>>>>>>> release process, documented on the Wiki here: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OODT/Release+Process >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The release was made from the OODT 1.2 tag at: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/oodt/tree/1.2.1/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A staged Maven repository is available at: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheoodt-1015/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing these packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1. The >>>>>> vote is >>>>>>>> open for at least the next 72 hours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Only votes from OODT PMC are binding, but folks are welcome to >>>>>> check the >>>>>>>> release candidate and voice their approval or disapproval. The >>>>>> vote passes >>>>>>>> if at least three binding +1 votes are cast. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release the packages as Apache OODT 1.2.1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release the packages because... >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Chris >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> P.S. Here is my +1. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >
