Exactly what I was thinking. Was thinking of using Dojo. Pretty cool stuff one can create with it.
On 8/28/07, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi , > Why don't we do web-remoting. Since we dont have a > servlet container we cannot go for servlet based approaches for web > remoting (Current standard ones being DWR or JSONRPC-JAVA) . These two > can make it possible for us to have javascript proxies of java objects > at the client side. Since we have an httpserver we can probably do > something similar to these frameworks and allow Ajax XHR calls direct > to the ejbs. > I have not yet investigated the webadmin :( .so i am not > aware how it currently functions but it think it allows me to call > ejbs via HTTP. We may be able to use some Ajax libraries like DOJO (or > any other one) which provide standard widgets for a good look and feel > at the client side. > So the approach i am proposing is that we have HTML > pages using the standard dojo widgets hosted on the http server and we > directly make async calls to the ejbs via http. But again I am just > shooting in the dark here. > > Regards > Manu > > On 8/28/07, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi Karan, what did u mean by the Apache Commons Http, did u mean Apache > > Commons HttpClient, but it does not support building Http servers just > > clients !!! > > > > On 8/26/07, Karan Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I have been thinking about this. Would it be a good idea to port > > > WebAdmin to a more commonly known MVC framework like JSF? > > > > > > We could embed an HttpServer using apache commons Http which could > > > service web requests. > > > > > > The benefits I see here are > > > 1. Standard framework which becomes easier to maintain and add more > > > features to > > > 2. Standard out of the box GUI components which could be dropped into > > > the web interface > > > 3. Availability of more powerful and complex GUI components , e.g. > > > myfaces.apache.org > > > 4. Easier/Faster for other contributors to jump in and provide > > > enhancements (no steep learning curve) > > > 5. Can be AJAX'ed easily through libraries like ajax4jsf etc. > > > > > > What do you think? > > > > > > -- > > > Karan Singh Malhi > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > > - Mohammad Nour > > > -- Karan Singh Malhi
