Does pluto work with Jetty (Technically it should work with any servlet container), but I remember using pluto a year and a half ago and I saw somewhere that it only worked with tomcat (or maybe a certain feature worked with only tomcat).
Do you know of any project which has successfully used Jetty + Pluto. What is the servlet container container for Geronimo? On 8/30/07, Raj Saini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think Jetty is the best choice as it is light weight, embeddable and > very small foot print. ActiveMQ uses that for its web console. > > I do not feel bundling tomcat with OpenEJB will be right think to do. > Admin Console should transparent from user. However, it would be nice to > provide the standalone web application which users can deploy inside > their application. For example, I embed ActiveMQ in one of my web > application. Earlier I was forced to use the embedded Jetty (i.e. > running a servlet (Jetty) container inside another contain (Tomcat). > Standalone web application should be deployable in any servlet container. > > Having web admin application as portelts is good idea but it would need > portal container. Pluto should be the choice (portals.apache.org) as it > is reference implementation of JSR-168 and comes with minimal baggage. > > And I feel JMX is the standard to manage OpenEJB server and deployed > components. > > Thanks, > > Raj > > Karan Malhi wrote: > >> 1- Do we have to use JSP or Portlets just because we wan to to use them, or > >> we just need to provide good looking dynamic WebAdmin for OpenEJB, we > >> started to think of the technology before we see what we really need > >> > > Thats a good one ;) . I think of it is "there is already something > > available which can allow you to do a lot more and a lot faster ". So > > JSF gives me the ability to build GUI rapidly, which is what we need > > for WebAdming (GUI). Portlets give me layout and common look and feel > > capabilities and other stuff. Allows me to "drop in" functionality at > > the correct location without affecting anything else on the page. > > Something like "Oh, I wish I could configure xyz on the server through > > web admin, or I wish I could customize the way i look at log files > > through webadmin" could be created and plugged in independently by a > > developer. > > This also allows somebody who just wants to add functionality on > > their own instance of web admin in a standard way. For example, if i > > created a cool portlet for my web admin, I can easily plugin into > > webadmin without knowing anything about the current webadmin > > framework. Later I realize that my portlet could be useful for the > > community as a whole, I can simply submit the code to OpenEJB and we > > can drop it into web admin. > > > >> 2- If we really need to use any of these technologies, we can search for > >> smaller Engines which provide the main functionality, > >> > > I think, For JSP support we could use Jasper to compile jsp's > > > > > >> sure - of Jetty, and we can provide OpenEJB we Jetty only to serve the > >> WebAdmin, or we can do as Karan suggested before to have OpenEJB distro > >> already bundled with Tomcat and/or Jetty . > >> > > Yes, ship the standalone version without webadmin and tomcat version > > would have webadmin. People can pick and choose the distro depending > > on what features they need > > > >> On 8/30/07, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> On 8/27/07, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Is it possible to support JSF without a full servlet container, jsp > >>>> enginge, and tag libs support? > >>>> > >>> I don't think so. JSF is layered atop JSP so although you might think > >>> of JSF with no servlet container (plus JSP) there's no JSF > >>> implementation I can think of that would run in a servlet container > >>> with no jsp engine. I'd like to hear I'm mistaken though. It'd be > >>> great to have a JSF console for openejb. I like the idea. > >>> > >>> Jacek > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Jacek Laskowski > >>> http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl > >>> > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks > >> - Mohammad Nour > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- Karan Singh Malhi
