There are many well established versioning systems that simply don't
work in osgi. Last time I talked to the osgi guys they were talking
expanding the version syntax to support common stuff like "3.0". Also
some of the implementations were talking about just converting numbers
on the fly.
-dain
On Mar 6, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think the issue will persist for the release somehow.
If the release is labelled 3.0, the OSGi version would still be
3.0.0, as afaik,
OSGi versions always have 3 digits.
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:42 PM, David Blevins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 6, 2008, at 9:26 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
OSGi versions have a specific format. The bnd plugin (or the felix
maven plugin) transforms
the maven version to the OSGi format.
See http://www.osgi.org/javadoc/r4/org/osgi/framework/Version.html
Thanks Guillaume.
That's pretty confusing, isn't it? IOpenejb versioning scheme is
3.0-SNAPSHOT whereas people who'd run its bundles have to specify
3.0.0-SNAPSHOT. I think we should change the version to be
3.0.0-SNAPSHOT to make it consistent. Other ideas?
We're almost done with the 3.0 issues, so it'll go away pretty soon
anyway.
-David
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
