On Mar 6, 2008, at 11:42 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I think the issue will persist for the release somehow.
If the release is labelled 3.0, the OSGi version would still be
3.0.0, as afaik,
OSGi versions always have 3 digits.
Oh, right. Ok so this is isn't a technical issue, just a point of
potential confusion for OSGi users. Is that right?
-David
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 6:42 PM, David Blevins
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mar 6, 2008, at 9:26 AM, Jacek Laskowski wrote:
On Thu, Mar 6, 2008 at 2:39 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
OSGi versions have a specific format. The bnd plugin (or the felix
maven plugin) transforms
the maven version to the OSGi format.
See http://www.osgi.org/javadoc/r4/org/osgi/framework/Version.html
Thanks Guillaume.
That's pretty confusing, isn't it? IOpenejb versioning scheme is
3.0-SNAPSHOT whereas people who'd run its bundles have to specify
3.0.0-SNAPSHOT. I think we should change the version to be
3.0.0-SNAPSHOT to make it consistent. Other ideas?
We're almost done with the 3.0 issues, so it'll go away pretty soon
anyway.
-David
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
