On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm I see your point David. So I guess it makes sense to go with 3.1.
> So what do we plan to call future releases delivering EJB 3.1 support?
> 3.x or 4.0?

3.1.1, 3.1.2 and so forth.

Jacek

-- 
Jacek Laskowski
Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Reply via email to