+1 for 3.1 I agree with the idea of having a 3.1 release for the exposure David want to have for the project on either InfoQ or TSS - exposure is very important - but we have to make a release notice that 3.1 is not so related to the EJB 3.1 - I mean to notify users that OEJB 3.1 is partial impl of the full EJB 3.1 specs - this way we get the interest of users to try what we already have of EJB 3.1 and make them so looking forward the upcomming releases of OEJB to try the more complete impl of EJB 3.1.
On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 8:21 PM, Jacek Laskowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 28, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Manu George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hmm I see your point David. So I guess it makes sense to go with 3.1. >> So what do we plan to call future releases delivering EJB 3.1 support? >> 3.x or 4.0? > > 3.1.1, 3.1.2 and so forth. > > Jacek > > -- > Jacek Laskowski > Notatnik Projektanta Java EE - http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
