On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Karan Malhi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it a possibility that we quietly release 3.0.1 (which includes all the > bug fixes). Then in a couple of weeks release 3.1 and make a big > announcement about it. This way we can post both the releases on our > website, keep the trunk as the main dev area (no branches) and will still > give people an option to download either the 3.0 version (without 3.1 > features) and/or the 3.1 version.
How we can do this if we will keep everything in the trunk ? - I am talking about people who need to download source code from our SVN repo. > > On Tue, Jul 1, 2008 at 2:27 PM, David Blevins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> >> On Jul 1, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Kevan Miller wrote: >> >> I did think about this issue, earlier. My read was the community was >>> working pretty well with trunk as the development/maintenance branch and >>> didn't, yet, need the additional overhead of maintaining multiple branches. >>> >> >> I think that's probably right. >> >> Another thing I was thinking is that we might be able to come up with some >> way to disable the EJB 3.1 functionality for those who need to be guaranteed >> they're only using EJB 3.0 or lower. >> >> -David >> >> >> > > > -- > Karan Singh Malhi > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
