Tests still need some more work, I have some problems of tests failure when comparing actual DD with the expected ones, I need to look how David Blevins did the test cases of Wls support.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Implemented a simple WAS EJB module which leverages the > ibm-ejb-jar-bnd.xmi specific DD for defining a JNDI with which the > Home interface of the EJB is binded. Wrote a simple test case to test > unmarshalling that xmi file using the generated JAXB tree. Everything > is OK, just I have to go home now and I will commit code by tomorrow. > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Solved my the JAXB classes generation issues and conflicts, working on >> writing test cases. Here how I am going to do it: >> >> 1- As WAS has a lot of features and extensions I will start by full >> simple scenarios to test. >> 2- Evolving from these simple scenarios and will build more complex >> ones trying to cover all aspects of WAS specific DDs, as much as >> possible and according to what we can provide in OpenEJB. >> >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Sorry for the that question, I will just follow what David Blevins did >>> with Sun and WebLogic specific DDs. >>> >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> I am fixing some name conflict probelms in the generated java classes. >>>> But I have one question about the generated package names, can we >>>> still use packages like *or.omg.xmi*, or we should change the package >>>> names to something like *org.apache.openejb.config.jee.was*, the whole >>>> question is about names only and its relation to being used in >>>> open-source project ? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Thanks >>>> - Mohammad Nour >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks >>> - Mohammad Nour >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Thanks >> - Mohammad Nour >> > > > > -- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour > -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour
