Mohammad, If it helps, I just parsed the xml doc and used JaxbJavaee to find what I was looking for. If I found it, then I assumed everything was correct. If you look at the faces section of the JeeTest, you will find that I am looking for managed bean elements, if I find those objects in the tree, then I assume that the parsing was correct. This does not mean that everything else might be correct, but in my case , we just needed managed beans and not anything else (even though I created the whole tree).
Very eager to use websphere descriptors, a couple of companies I know of would love to see this feature supported. On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tests still need some more work, I have some problems of tests failure > when comparing actual DD with the expected ones, I need to look how > David Blevins did the test cases of Wls support. > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Implemented a simple WAS EJB module which leverages the > > ibm-ejb-jar-bnd.xmi specific DD for defining a JNDI with which the > > Home interface of the EJB is binded. Wrote a simple test case to test > > unmarshalling that xmi file using the generated JAXB tree. Everything > > is OK, just I have to go home now and I will commit code by tomorrow. > > > > On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Solved my the JAXB classes generation issues and conflicts, working on > >> writing test cases. Here how I am going to do it: > >> > >> 1- As WAS has a lot of features and extensions I will start by full > >> simple scenarios to test. > >> 2- Evolving from these simple scenarios and will build more complex > >> ones trying to cover all aspects of WAS specific DDs, as much as > >> possible and according to what we can provide in OpenEJB. > >> > >> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> Sorry for the that question, I will just follow what David Blevins did > >>> with Sun and WebLogic specific DDs. > >>> > >>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din > >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>>> I am fixing some name conflict probelms in the generated java classes. > >>>> But I have one question about the generated package names, can we > >>>> still use packages like *or.omg.xmi*, or we should change the package > >>>> names to something like *org.apache.openejb.config.jee.was*, the whole > >>>> question is about names only and its relation to being used in > >>>> open-source project ? > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Thanks > >>>> - Mohammad Nour > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Thanks > >>> - Mohammad Nour > >>> > >> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Thanks > >> - Mohammad Nour > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Thanks > > - Mohammad Nour > > > > > > -- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour > -- Karan Singh Malhi
