On Jul 17, 2008, at 9:08 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din wrote:

Tests still need some more work, I have some problems of tests failure
when comparing actual DD with the expected ones, I need to look how
David Blevins did the test cases of Wls support.

Standard approach is to generate a sample xml document that has one or two of every possible element. Then you can copy the JaxbWlsTest and go from there.

-David

On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:37 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Implemented a simple WAS EJB module which leverages the
ibm-ejb-jar-bnd.xmi specific DD for defining a JNDI with which the
Home interface of the EJB is binded. Wrote a simple test case to test
unmarshalling that xmi file using the generated JAXB tree. Everything
is OK, just I have to go home now and I will commit code by tomorrow.

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Solved my the JAXB classes generation issues and conflicts, working on
writing test cases. Here how I am going to do it:

1- As WAS has a lot of features and extensions I will start by full
simple scenarios to test.
2- Evolving from these simple scenarios and will build more complex
ones trying to cover all aspects of WAS specific DDs, as much as
possible and according to what we can provide in OpenEJB.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for the that question, I will just follow what David Blevins did
with Sun and WebLogic specific DDs.

On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 4:34 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am fixing some name conflict probelms in the generated java classes.
But I have one question about the generated package names, can we
still use packages like *or.omg.xmi*, or we should change the package names to something like *org.apache.openejb.config.jee.was*, the whole
question is about names only and its relation to being used in
open-source project ?

--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour




--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour




--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour




--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour




--
Thanks
- Mohammad Nour


Reply via email to