Don't think the patch came through - its on gist.guthub.com here: http://gist.github.com/348454
Jon On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Jonathan Gallimore < [email protected]> wrote: > I'm looking at this as we speak - just about to run the Rat tool over the > source. I got the itests working with the attached patch file, which just > merges in org.apache.xbean:xbean-finder instead of > org.apache.openejb:xbean-finder. > > Jon > > > On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 10:28 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote: > >> So while Ivan fights with the ActiveMQ issue that might potentially affect >> the release, let's get some more votes so that we're ready to either close >> or reroll. Currently, we would need more votes to close. >> >> When you get a moment, take a quick look at the binaries and throw down a >> vote. We're pretty much relying on TCK numbers for this vote -- those are >> looking good without the ActiveMQ patch that Ivan is working on -- so >> there's not much "run it" work to do in evaluating this release. >> >> -David >> >> On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:45 AM, David Blevins wrote: >> >> Ok, finally got some binaries up. Took a few spins but finally got >>> something up with good signatures. >>> >>> The branch to become a tag: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/branches/openejb-3.0.2/ >>> >>> The binaries: >>> >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-014/ >>> >>> So assuming these binaries pass the TCK, here is my +1 vote. >>> >>> Vote open for 72 hours or as long as it takes to get some TCK numbers >>> against the proposed binaries. >>> >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >>> >> >
