On Mar 28, 2010, at 11:17 PM, Ivan wrote:

I might give up to merge it to the coming Geronimo 2.1.5  :-(

No worries, we can hold the vote open for as long as you're willing to keep fighting :) And thanks for putting so much effort into it -- very appreciated!

We'll be waiting for your signal.

-David


2010/3/29 David Blevins <[email protected]>


On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:40 PM, David Blevins wrote:


On Mar 24, 2010, at 7:04 PM, Ivan wrote:

Please ignore my previous request, it might not completly fix the issue I
wanted :-(


Chatting with Ivan on IRC. We're going to try an alternate technique to finding the issue. Basically the object in question is not designed for multi-threaded use under the assumption that is designed only to be used inside the transaction in which it was created -- and all transactions are
single threaded.

So we came up with an alternate patch:


https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12439747/OPENEJB-1246-alt.txt

We'll wait for some TCK data on that and see if that doesn't help
illuminate the issue caused by the related ActiveMQ fix Ivan is working
with.


So where are we at with the ActiveMQ/EJB issues?



-David



2010/3/25 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]>

Hi David,

I'm trying to run the usual ant build script that grabs the itest
artifacts
from the Maven repository and tries to run them against OpenEJB
standalone
and in Tomcat. I'm getting a java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
org/apache/xbean/finder/ClassFinder error. (Full log and build script
attached). Is this a problem?

Jon


On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:45 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]
wrote:

Ok, finally got some binaries up. Took a few spins but finally got
something up with good signatures.

The branch to become a tag:

http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/branches/openejb-3.0.2/

The binaries:


https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenejb-014/

So assuming these binaries pass the TCK, here is my +1 vote.

Vote open for 72 hours or as long as it takes to get some TCK numbers
against the proposed binaries.


-David





--
Ivan







--
Ivan

Reply via email to