On May 12, 2010, at 4:48 AM, Henri Gomez wrote: >> I saw in the history, you revert to JPA 1.0. Thanks for that too. > > OpenEJB 3.1.3 will only be JPA 1.0 ? > > We should wait for OpenEJB 3.2.0 to get JPA 2.0 ?
Right, some sort of 3.2 release. Milestone, etc. not too sure. On May 12, 2010, at 5:54 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > can you please create an OpenEJB 3.2 release in JIRA so we can mark issues > resolved for that? I added a 3.2 and a 3.2-beta-1. Open to suggestions on what we call the next release. I can see two approaches: 1) Wait till we've at least fully converted the javaee-api-5 module to a javaee-api-6 module, then start cutting 3.2, 3.2.1, etc. 2) Start shipping betas now and hold 3.2 final for when we complete our Java EE 6 work. I guess #2 would be my preference. It'd be nice to have some flexibility in trunk and still be able to get some releases out right away (beta ones). As well a more feature complete 3.2 final makes for a news worthy release announcement. Thoughts? -David
