David Blevins wrote: > > > On May 12, 2010, at 1:01 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO wrote: > >> >> >> David Blevins wrote: >>> >>> I guess #2 would be my preference. It'd be nice to have some >>> flexibility >>> in trunk and still be able to get some releases out right away (beta >>> ones). As well a more feature complete 3.2 final makes for a news >>> worthy >>> release announcement. >>> >> >> Fully agree with number 2. >> We have end users asking for new features. >> Flexibility has been one of the most appreciated feature for a while. >> We need to push new things and target Java EE 6 compatibility. But we >> need >> to be able to deliver intermediate binaries with requested features. >> >> So let's start working now ;-) > > Maybe we should start working up a 3.2-beta-1 and 3.1.3 release and put > them both up. It will probably be at least a week before we could have > something up for voting, but it will definitely be longer if we don't > start working towards it. > > Anyone have any release thoughts? >
That's fine. +1. Jean-Louis -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Time-for-a-3-2-branch-tp2131789p2197470.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
