David Blevins wrote: > > I guess #2 would be my preference. It'd be nice to have some flexibility > in trunk and still be able to get some releases out right away (beta > ones). As well a more feature complete 3.2 final makes for a news worthy > release announcement. >
Fully agree with number 2. We have end users asking for new features. Flexibility has been one of the most appreciated feature for a while. We need to push new things and target Java EE 6 compatibility. But we need to be able to deliver intermediate binaries with requested features. So let's start working now ;-) Jean-Louis -- View this message in context: http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Time-for-a-3-2-branch-tp2131789p2196694.html Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
