Thanks for that. I have additional local changes to support the XML version of @Asynchronous, and I have most of it completed. I'm hoping to revisit it in a few days. Once those changes are completed I would like to move onto being able to specifying the threading for the container, as it is currently hard-coded (min=1,max=20).
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:50 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote: > Matthew, > > Finally got a chance to get OPENEJB-1135 committed. Thanks so much for > this excellent patch! > > A fantastic start on this functionality! > > If you're interested in working on it more, Thiago's email gives a good > overview of basically what it takes to support the xml version of > @Asynchronous. > > No worries if you're too busy, we can dump the task back into the > "available" pool. > > Really nice and clean patch! > > > -David > >
