Hi, seems that there are still some work required for the Asynchronous support. If no one had begun the work, I would like to continue to work on it. :-)
2010/6/2 Matthew B. Jones <[email protected]> > Thanks for that. I have additional local changes to support the XML version > of @Asynchronous, and I have most of it completed. I'm hoping to revisit it > in a few days. Once those changes are completed I would like to move onto > being able to specifying the threading for the container, as it is > currently > hard-coded (min=1,max=20). > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:50 AM, David Blevins <[email protected] > >wrote: > > > Matthew, > > > > Finally got a chance to get OPENEJB-1135 committed. Thanks so much for > > this excellent patch! > > > > A fantastic start on this functionality! > > > > If you're interested in working on it more, Thiago's email gives a good > > overview of basically what it takes to support the xml version of > > @Asynchronous. > > > > No worries if you're too busy, we can dump the task back into the > > "available" pool. > > > > Really nice and clean patch! > > > > > > -David > > > > > -- Ivan
