I'm happy to have a go at getting some of these working. I've done a bit of work on our Arquillian adapters so I'm happy to try and help out anyone else who wants to have a look as well.
I've also got our moviefun sample working with both adapters, and got it running a test with Selenium. This is checked in alongside our adapters. I'm planning to demonstrate this at JAX London in a couple of weeks time. Jon On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:08 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]>wrote: > So one of the things I think would be really excellent for the 1.0.0-beta-2 > is to get our Arquillian support polished and released. > > I showed our Arquillian support at the JavaOne TomEE talk to demonstrate > that a) it works embeddable and b) yes it runs in 2-3 seconds. I wasn't > able to show too many examples though. > > The Arquillian Showcase is the trove of examples we really need to show off > TomEE. I tried to get some of them to run the night before the TomEE talk, > but our adapter uses an old API and overall I just had too many issues. The > minutes of the clock ticked away and I eventually went back to focusing on > the "old" Arquillian support. > > If we can get this running, the Arquillian guys are of course happy to show > off TomEE a little. As well it would make great content for screencasts and > technical articles. > > https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-showcase > > Not only is there a lot of content there in terms of examples, but many of > them run on the other vendors too, so it's also a good way to do > comparisons. Who knows, maybe we're faster than everyone or the same speed? > Or slower and we need to do some tuning? > > Plenty of growth for us there. > > Here's the current code: > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee/ > > The 'arquillian-tomee-embedded' adapter is the primary one we'd want to get > tuned and oiled. The 'arquillian-tomee-remote' would be the next one. > > > -David > >
