Hi Romain, How's this looking? Is there anything I can do to help? I'm keen to show both adapters (although I'm happy to do that with the example app) at JAX. I'm keen to help out so if there's something specific you can point me at, that would be cool. If not, I notice the remote adapter is currently commented out of the build. I could take a look at that.
Jon On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:33 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]>wrote: > not so far (we are in alpha 5 and showcase uses CR1) but it needs some > modifications > > - Romain > > 2011/10/12 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> > > > Sweet. Are we far behind version-wise? > > > > Jon > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > i'm upgrading arquillian-tomee-embedded (and common) versions > > > > > > - Romain > > > > > > 2011/10/12 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]> > > > > > > > I'm happy to have a go at getting some of these working. I've done a > > bit > > > of > > > > work on our Arquillian adapters so I'm happy to try and help out > anyone > > > > else > > > > who wants to have a look as well. > > > > > > > > I've also got our moviefun sample working with both adapters, and got > > it > > > > running a test with Selenium. This is checked in alongside our > > adapters. > > > > I'm > > > > planning to demonstrate this at JAX London in a couple of weeks time. > > > > > > > > Jon > > > > > > > > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:08 PM, David Blevins < > > [email protected] > > > > >wrote: > > > > > > > > > So one of the things I think would be really excellent for the > > > > 1.0.0-beta-2 > > > > > is to get our Arquillian support polished and released. > > > > > > > > > > I showed our Arquillian support at the JavaOne TomEE talk to > > > demonstrate > > > > > that a) it works embeddable and b) yes it runs in 2-3 seconds. I > > > wasn't > > > > > able to show too many examples though. > > > > > > > > > > The Arquillian Showcase is the trove of examples we really need to > > show > > > > off > > > > > TomEE. I tried to get some of them to run the night before the > TomEE > > > > talk, > > > > > but our adapter uses an old API and overall I just had too many > > issues. > > > > The > > > > > minutes of the clock ticked away and I eventually went back to > > focusing > > > > on > > > > > the "old" Arquillian support. > > > > > > > > > > If we can get this running, the Arquillian guys are of course happy > > to > > > > show > > > > > off TomEE a little. As well it would make great content for > > > screencasts > > > > and > > > > > technical articles. > > > > > > > > > > https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-showcase > > > > > > > > > > Not only is there a lot of content there in terms of examples, but > > many > > > > of > > > > > them run on the other vendors too, so it's also a good way to do > > > > > comparisons. Who knows, maybe we're faster than everyone or the > same > > > > speed? > > > > > Or slower and we need to do some tuning? > > > > > > > > > > Plenty of growth for us there. > > > > > > > > > > Here's the current code: > > > > > > > > > > http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee/ > > > > > > > > > > The 'arquillian-tomee-embedded' adapter is the primary one we'd > want > > to > > > > get > > > > > tuned and oiled. The 'arquillian-tomee-remote' would be the next > > one. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
