Sweet. Are we far behind version-wise?

Jon

On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 9:27 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
<[email protected]>wrote:

> i'm upgrading arquillian-tomee-embedded (and common) versions
>
> - Romain
>
> 2011/10/12 Jonathan Gallimore <[email protected]>
>
> > I'm happy to have a go at getting some of these working. I've done a bit
> of
> > work on our Arquillian adapters so I'm happy to try and help out anyone
> > else
> > who wants to have a look as well.
> >
> > I've also got our moviefun sample working with both adapters, and got it
> > running a test with Selenium. This is checked in alongside our adapters.
> > I'm
> > planning to demonstrate this at JAX London in a couple of weeks time.
> >
> > Jon
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:08 PM, David Blevins <[email protected]
> > >wrote:
> >
> > > So one of the things I think would be really excellent for the
> > 1.0.0-beta-2
> > > is to get our Arquillian support polished and released.
> > >
> > > I showed our Arquillian support at the JavaOne TomEE talk to
> demonstrate
> > > that a) it works embeddable and b) yes it runs in 2-3 seconds.  I
> wasn't
> > > able to show too many examples though.
> > >
> > > The Arquillian Showcase is the trove of examples we really need to show
> > off
> > > TomEE.  I tried to get some of them to run the night before the TomEE
> > talk,
> > > but our adapter uses an old API and overall I just had too many issues.
> >  The
> > > minutes of the clock ticked away and I eventually went back to focusing
> > on
> > > the "old" Arquillian support.
> > >
> > > If we can get this running, the Arquillian guys are of course happy to
> > show
> > > off TomEE a little.  As well it would make great content for
> screencasts
> > and
> > > technical articles.
> > >
> > >  https://github.com/arquillian/arquillian-showcase
> > >
> > > Not only is there a lot of content there in terms of examples, but many
> > of
> > > them run on the other vendors too, so it's also a good way to do
> > > comparisons.  Who knows, maybe we're faster than everyone or the same
> > speed?
> > >  Or slower and we need to do some tuning?
> > >
> > > Plenty of growth for us there.
> > >
> > > Here's the current code:
> > >
> > >  http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openejb/trunk/arquillian-tomee/
> > >
> > > The 'arquillian-tomee-embedded' adapter is the primary one we'd want to
> > get
> > > tuned and oiled.  The 'arquillian-tomee-remote' would be the next one.
> > >
> > >
> > > -David
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to