On Jan 10, 2012, at 12:17 PM, dsh wrote:

> +1 from me too (I am good with either including or not including OEJB
> in the comparison matrix).

Did a quick look at the Google Analytics.  Some stats from the last 30 days:

Between the three main "product" links, here's where traffic goes:

 28% - OpenEJB button
 21% - TomEE button
 11% - TomEE+ button

So I think we should definitely keep it and having it include some OpenEJB 
content would be wise.  A comparison that includes all three would seem like a 
great way to educate people that all three are effectively variations of the 
same thing.

Looking further at the analytics what seems to be bringing people to our site 
is split nearly 50/50 between "OpenEJB" and "TomEE"

Looking at the top four searched keywords:

 883 - openejb
 876 - tomee
 387 - apache tomee
 138 - open ejb

Some incredibly impressive catch-up considering the three short months that 
TomEE's actually been released, just barely edging out OpenEJB if you add up 
all the "TomEE" variants.

However the two are nearly equally dominant.  At least for the moment :)

So any volunteers to throw up a little table that compares them by the Java EE 
specs they implement?


-David


> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> +1, great idea Daniel !
>> 
>> Jean-Louis
>> 
>> 
>> 2012/1/10 dsh <[email protected]>
>> 
>>> Does it make sense to have a comparison table that calls out the
>>> differences between:
>>> 
>>> * Apache OpenEJB
>>> * Apache TomEE
>>> * Apache TomEE+
>>> 
>>> and then link to that comparision matrix. The matrix itself could
>>> contain a details link for each one mentioned above.
>>> 
>>> Cheers
>>> Daniel
>>> 
>>> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:53 PM, AndyG <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>> The index page link for OpenEJB "View details" is not pointing anywhere -
>>>> Maybe it should just link to the documentation.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> View this message in context:
>>> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4281873.html
>>>> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>> 

Reply via email to