I found these EJB 3.1 versus EJB 3.1 Lite comparison Tables: http://www.theserverside.com/news/1321142/Part-Three-New-Features-in-EJB-31 http://www.scribd.com/doc/58406396/91/EJB-Lite http://books.google.de/books?id=8pQbMr5X-yMC&pg=PA189&lpg=PA189&dq=ejb+lite+comparison&source=bl&ots=cBACMGm1DR&sig=L_dRM2onWjcSRiWEcHZDzvI2sSk&hl=de&sa=X&ei=-e8UT_3gMIHNswbthN1F&ved=0CFkQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=ejb%20lite%20comparison&f=false http://www.developer.com/img/2010/05/EJBLite_EJB-Full.JPG
Cheers Daniel On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:48 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > I updated the comparison to include TomEE as well. > > I also trimmed the EJB content as I figure there's a good chance people will > want to use it to compare TomEE and TomEE+ and aren't there for EJB. > > There's a new doc here that shows the evolution of EJB, which I thought could > give some insight into how we got to where we are (an "EJB" project with an > EE implementation). > > http://openejb.apache.org/evolution-of-ejb.html > > Probably there's more that can be done there. > > > -David > > > On Jan 14, 2012, at 11:25 AM, stratwine wrote: > >> Oh yes. It didn't strike before that it can be confusing.. So just the table >> should be good then ! >> >> -Vishwa >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4295486.html >> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
