Can we get EJB Lite integrated too or doesn't that makes sense? I like the figures on this page [1]. Namely: Table 1, Figure 1 and Table 2. Matthias Weßendorf did something similar at [2].
[1]: http://jaxenter.com/introducing-the-java-ee-web-profile-36201.html [2]: http://it-republik.de/jaxenter/artikel/Java-EE-6-Web-Profile-3530.html Cheers Daniel On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 1:48 AM, David Blevins <[email protected]> wrote: > I updated the comparison to include TomEE as well. > > I also trimmed the EJB content as I figure there's a good chance people will > want to use it to compare TomEE and TomEE+ and aren't there for EJB. > > There's a new doc here that shows the evolution of EJB, which I thought could > give some insight into how we got to where we are (an "EJB" project with an > EE implementation). > > http://openejb.apache.org/evolution-of-ejb.html > > Probably there's more that can be done there. > > > -David > > > On Jan 14, 2012, at 11:25 AM, stratwine wrote: > >> Oh yes. It didn't strike before that it can be confusing.. So just the table >> should be good then ! >> >> -Vishwa >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Website-OpenEJB-link-tp4281873p4295486.html >> Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
