On Jan 22, 2012, at 3:44 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > On Jan 22, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> What about using jul by default and removing our default configs (jul + >> lo4j)? These confs sucks since it is never what the user wants and it hides >> a big part of the whole logging. >> >> Ill have a try tonight, shout if you see any issue with it. > > So how does one re enable the old logging if they happened to like it?
Looks like it's been removed. I'm happy to see change and getting some ability to better work with JULI is great. I really would like to maintain some of the logging features we've had http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4176924/how-to-configure-openejb-logging https://blogs.apache.org/openejb/entry/example_common_troubleshooting_flags http://openejb.apache.org/examples-trunk/troubleshooting/README.html I'm completely open to whichever we want as enabled by default, but it would be great to at least have the same features there for those who do like them. -David
