On Jan 22, 2012, at 4:20 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > On Jan 22, 2012, at 4:03 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> >> On Jan 22, 2012, at 3:44 PM, David Blevins wrote: >> >>> >>> On Jan 22, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> What about using jul by default and removing our default configs (jul + >>>> lo4j)? These confs sucks since it is never what the user wants and it hides >>>> a big part of the whole logging. >>>> >>>> Ill have a try tonight, shout if you see any issue with it. >>> >>> So how does one re enable the old logging if they happened to like it? >> >> Looks like it's been removed. >> >> I'm happy to see change and getting some ability to better work with JULI is >> great. I really would like to maintain some of the logging features we've >> had >> >> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4176924/how-to-configure-openejb-logging >> https://blogs.apache.org/openejb/entry/example_common_troubleshooting_flags >> http://openejb.apache.org/examples-trunk/troubleshooting/README.html > > Missed the main doc: > > http://openejb.apache.org/configuring-logging-in-tests.html
Restored the functionality. It's not the default as moving away from log4j is a great step forward, but it's at least there for those that want to use it. -David
