On Jan 22, 2012, at 4:03 PM, David Blevins wrote: > > On Jan 22, 2012, at 3:44 PM, David Blevins wrote: > >> >> On Jan 22, 2012, at 8:35 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> What about using jul by default and removing our default configs (jul + >>> lo4j)? These confs sucks since it is never what the user wants and it hides >>> a big part of the whole logging. >>> >>> Ill have a try tonight, shout if you see any issue with it. >> >> So how does one re enable the old logging if they happened to like it? > > Looks like it's been removed. > > I'm happy to see change and getting some ability to better work with JULI is > great. I really would like to maintain some of the logging features we've had > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4176924/how-to-configure-openejb-logging > https://blogs.apache.org/openejb/entry/example_common_troubleshooting_flags > http://openejb.apache.org/examples-trunk/troubleshooting/README.html
Missed the main doc: http://openejb.apache.org/configuring-logging-in-tests.html -David
