AFAIR, most of builds are in Jenckins, so we are free to fire a build each
time openjpa, openwebbeans, .... is built. Right ?

Regarding that issue, what does the current situation brings?

Jean-Louis


Le 18 avril 2012 12:00, Romain Manni-Bucau <[email protected]> a écrit :

> No, buildbot does it too.
>
> The issue is not techinical but human. Does openwebbeans users look tomee
> snapshot? mainly no beacuse that's not their build. That's the issue.
>
> Well i'm not opposed to separate both since i follow both, just i wanted
> you to note braking a consistent project in several subproject can lead to
> some weird builds.
>
> Note: we could do subproject for arquillian, maven and utilities too.
>
> - Romain
>
>
> 2012/4/18 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>
>
> > Romain,
> >
> > I guess we now have a jenckins project for OpenEJB.
> >
> > Isn't it a good way to manage dependencies between builds?
> > That could solve the issue you mentioned?
> >
> > JLouis
> >
> >
> > Le 18 avril 2012 11:42, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> a
> > écrit :
> >
> > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > >
> > > > it is not a technical issue,
> > > >
> > > > if there are 2 trunks there are 2 CI builds and we always have to
> watch
> > > > both. That's the issue IMO. Typically an openejb dev who don't care
> > about
> > > > tomee can break tomee easily if we separate both. Today buildbot will
> > > shoot
> > > > after him.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Build bot can still shoot after him/her when TomEE is built with the
> > latest
> > > OpenEJB code, but as you said this is not the main issue here
> > >
> > > So we should make up our minds :), do we need a [VOTE] ?
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > - Romain
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2012/4/18 Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > no but there are integration issues (lib conflicts, how is it
> > > > integrated
> > > > > > etc) which are different.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > One drawback of keeping tomee in openejb is the size of the
> build.
> > > One
> > > > > pro
> > > > > > is the buil dis consistent.
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh, now I get it, but in that regard we can do like what Jackrabbit
> > > did,
> > > > so
> > > > > mainly you have a repo like this:
> > > > >
> > > > > <REPO_ROOT>
> > > > >  /trunk
> > > > >  /tags
> > > > >  /branches
> > > > >
> > > > > what they did for Oak, which is a new approach for Jackrabbit and
> > > hence a
> > > > > new project, they created a sub repos, like this
> > > > >
> > > > > <REPO_ROOT>
> > > > >  /trunk
> > > > >  /tags
> > > > >  /branches
> > > > >  /oak
> > > > >  ../trunk
> > > > >  ../tags
> > > > >  ../branches
> > > > >
> > > > > In that regard we can manage each of OpenEJB and TomEE separately,
> > > > thoughts
> > > > > ?
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > - Romain
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2012/4/18 Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:43 AM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <
> > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I guess in a ideal world, that'd be better to have Apache
> TomEE
> > > > has a
> > > > > > Top
> > > > > > > > Project in Apache.
> > > > > > > > But it also has side effects and negative points
> (dependencies
> > > when
> > > > > > > > releasing ...).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Is there a lot of differences between OpenEJB
> > (Embdeded/Standalone)
> > > > and
> > > > > > > TomEE ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > JLouis
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Le 18 avril 2012 10:14, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > [email protected]>
> > > > a
> > > > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > same idea: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJBwhy
> > > is
> > > > > > tomee
> > > > > > > > > everywhere (name of the page, title...)?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > - Romain
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 2012/4/18 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <[email protected]>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > +1 with Mohammad and Romain.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > JLouis
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Le 18 avril 2012 01:25, Mohammad Nour El-Din <
> > > > > > > [email protected]>
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > écrit :
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 1:05 AM, David Blevins <
> > > > > > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > > > > > > >wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > Was just in reference to which IRC channel to use,
> > #tomee
> > > > or
> > > > > > > > #openejb
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > I know :), the question was more for building a case
> of a
> > > > > > statement
> > > > > > > > :).
> > > > > > > > > > For
> > > > > > > > > > > me I am in favor of OpenEJB cause thats the origin and
> > who
> > > > > knows
> > > > > > > > about
> > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > future, more specifically with the cloud addition to
> JEE
> > 7
> > > we
> > > > > may
> > > > > > > > come
> > > > > > > > > up
> > > > > > > > > > > with another packaging and give it another name but
> still
> > > it
> > > > > will
> > > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > > > > OpenEJB.
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Apr 17, 2012, at 3:51 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Are we talking about project names or users
> > interests.
> > > > > Cause
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > first
> > > > > > > > > > > > > place they go to openejb.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe OpenEJB should be the main name, TomEE is
> > > just
> > > > a
> > > > > > name
> > > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > > > one
> > > > > > > > > > > > > OpenEJB packaging which implements the WebProfile,
> so
> > > it
> > > > is
> > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > > > > > OpenEJB.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thats my 2 cents.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 11:25 PM, Romain
> Manni-Bucau
> > > > > > > > > > > > > <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Tomee and openejb redirecting to tomee-openejb?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> I know eveybody likes tomee but openejb shouldnt
> be
> > > > > > forgotten
> > > > > > > > IMO.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> - Romain
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> Le 17 avr. 2012 22:54, "Karan Malhi" <
> > > > > [email protected]
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > écrit
> > > > > > > > > > > :
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Hi,
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Currently on irc if somebody wants to join
> #tomee,
> > > they
> > > > > get
> > > > > > > > > > > redirected
> > > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> #openejb. Personally, I'd prefer the reverse i.e.
> > > > #tomee
> > > > > > > being
> > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > > >> primary
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> IRC channel. So if somebody joins #openejb they
> get
> > > > > > > redirected
> > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > > #tomee.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> It also gives us the opportunity to have a nice
> > > welcome
> > > > > > > message
> > > > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > > > > > folks
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> like "Welcome to TomEE - A pure Tomcat based Java
> > EE
> > > 6
> > > > > web
> > > > > > > > > profile
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> certified server". Just another little thing to
> > help
> > > > > spread
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > word.
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> What does everybody else think?
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> --
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> Karan Singh Malhi
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>> twitter.com/KaranSinghMalhi
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Mohammad Nour
> > > > > > > > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > > > > > > > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your
> balance
> > > you
> > > > > must
> > > > > > > > keep
> > > > > > > > > > > > moving"
> > > > > > > > > > > > > - Albert Einstein
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > > > > > - Mohammad Nour
> > > > > > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > > > > > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance
> you
> > > must
> > > > > > keep
> > > > > > > > > > moving"
> > > > > > > > > > > - Albert Einstein
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > - Mohammad Nour
> > > > > > > ----
> > > > > > > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must
> > keep
> > > > > > moving"
> > > > > > > - Albert Einstein
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Thanks
> > > > > - Mohammad Nour
> > > > > ----
> > > > > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep
> > > > moving"
> > > > > - Albert Einstein
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Thanks
> > > - Mohammad Nour
> > > ----
> > > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep
> > moving"
> > > - Albert Einstein
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to