This is part of MANIFEST.MF

Bundle-ManifestVersion: 2
Bundle-Vendor: Eclipse.org - EclipseLink Project
Require-Capability: osgi.ee; filter:="(&(osgi.ee=JavaSE)(version>=1.8)
 )"
Import-Package: javax.sql;resolution:=optional,org.osgi.framework;reso
 lution:=optional,org.osgi.service.jpa;version="1.1.0"
Implementation-Vendor: Eclipse.org - EclipseLink Project
Export-Package: javax.persistence;jpa="2.2";version="2.2.3",javax.pers
 istence.criteria;jpa="2.2";version="2.2.3",javax.persistence.metamode
 l;jpa="2.2";version="2.2.3",javax.persistence.spi;jpa="2.2";version="
 2.2.3",org.osgi.service.jpa;version="1.1.0"
Bundle-Name: Jakarta Persistence API 2.2
Bundle-Version: 2.2.3
Bundle-ClassPath: .
Bundle-Activator: org.eclipse.persistence.javax.persistence.osgi.Activ
 ator

I was unable to find "Provide-Capability" in the jar (but maybe I was
looking in wrong place ...)

On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 12:58, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hmmm, looks like old style, doesnt it have Provide-Capability somewhere
> (sorry i dont have a computer handy right now)?
> Maybe reopen a thread @g Mark if you want to do that, but we should also
> include micrporofile in that thread to enforce our consistence IMHO.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le mar. 17 déc. 2019 à 06:56, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> a
> écrit :
>
> > I'm not familiar with OSGI
> > jakarta.jas has `Activator implements org.osgi.framework.BundleActivator`
> > and `OSGiProviderResolver implements PersistenceProviderResolver,
> > PersistenceProvider`
> >
> > Please let me know if I should proceed with my PR, or if it would be
> > better to dismiss it :)
> >
> > On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 at 04:42, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Le lun. 16 déc. 2019 à 22:13, Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>
> > a
> > > écrit :
> > >
> > > > jakarta persistence is EPL. It's not a problem to add it but would
> > love to
> > > > avoid it.
> > > > The simplest way would be to add those module information to
> > Geronimo-jpa.
> > > > Could do a mass release of those specs then.
> > > >
> > >
> > > We should stick to a single strategy for all spec jars with a compatible
> > > license IMHO.
> > > I dont care which way we go but I dont want a case by case choice which
> > > would be hard to support.
> > >
> > > Also having jakarta deps will reduce dependency management for post users
> > > so i see it as a 60-40 for jakata.
> > >
> > >
> > > > LieGrue,
> > > > strub
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > Am 16.12.2019 um 14:39 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >
> > > > > Here is the diff
> > > > >
> > https://github.com/apache/openjpa/compare/OPENJPA-2798-java11-friendly
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 20:38, Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Current status: In my branch I have changed jpa_spec with
> > > > >> jakarta.persistence and the build is green
> > > > >> I can drop this branch if there is better way to achieve java11
> > > > compatibility :)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I always thought modules is like dependencies
> > > > >> I only have openjpa dependency right now and do have all transitive
> > > > >> jars available, so my pom is cleaner ...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 20:32, Mark Struberg
> > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> I'm not sure what the status is right now. But one of the big pros
> > > > over the standard jpa api has always been that it works even with OSGi.
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>> LieGrue,
> > > > >>> strub
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>>> Am 16.12.2019 um 14:24 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>:
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Not "compile time dependencies" but "spec jars". Mainly because
> > the
> > > > user
> > > > >>>> must import it himself (this is what he use to code so it should
> > be a
> > > > first
> > > > >>>> level dep + to avoid the exclusion mess since there are like 6-7
> > spec
> > > > jars
> > > > >>>> libs use and conflict).
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > >>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > >>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > >>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > >>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > >>>> <
> > > >
> > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > > >
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>> Le lun. 16 déc. 2019 à 14:15, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > > a
> > > > >>>> écrit :
> > > > >>>>
> > > > >>>>> BTW why compile time dependency should't be transitive?
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 20:12, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > solomax...@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> I can create PR in a minute (based on
> > OPENJPA-2798-java11-friendly
> > > > >>>>> branch)
> > > > >>>>>> Was planning to add "Automatic-Module-Name"s to manifest
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 at 20:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > rmannibu...@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Nobody uses it but adding them breaks apps ;), yeah.
> > > > >>>>>>> Anyway openjpa shouldnt have jpa api transitive anyway IMHO so
> > not
> > > > a
> > > > >>>>> big
> > > > >>>>>>> deal while we dont break OSGi case in the feature.xml.
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Romain Manni-Bucau
> > > > >>>>>>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
> > > > >>>>>>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
> > > > >>>>>>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <
> > > > >>>>> https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
> > > > >>>>>>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
> > > > >>>>>>> <
> > > > >>>>>
> > > >
> > https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>> Le lun. 16 déc. 2019 à 13:52, Mark Struberg
> > > > <strub...@yahoo.de.invalid>
> > > > >>>>> a
> > > > >>>>>>> écrit :
> > > > >>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> I'd go with fixing our module info in geronimo-jpa.
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> But otoh nobody is using modules anyway it seems ...
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>> LieGrue,
> > > > >>>>>>>> strub
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Am 11.12.2019 um 06:39 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > >>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > > > >>>>>>>>> :
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Yes this one
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> For openjpa the challenge will likely to not have
> > module-info in
> > > > >>>>> main
> > > > >>>>>>>>> artifacts - guess we can duplicate artifacts with a
> > classifier
> > > > >>>>> jpms or
> > > > >>>>>>>> so -
> > > > >>>>>>>>> to avoid to break some servers and env.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Last thing to take care: all osgi integration, i didnt check
> > > > >>>>> jakarta jar
> > > > >>>>>>>>> supports it as well as our spec jar.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> So likely some validation work to do but yes it sounds like
> > the
> > > > >>>>> plan.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Hope it helps even if not a straight "yes".
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>> Le mer. 11 déc. 2019 à 03:57, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > >>>>> solomax...@gmail.com> a
> > > > >>>>>>>>> écrit :
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Do you mean this one:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> <dependency>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>  <groupId>org.eclipse.persistence</groupId>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>  <artifactId>jakarta.persistence</artifactId>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>  <version>2.2.2</version>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> </dependency>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Looks good to me!
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Shall I create PR? (the task seems to be doable for me :)))
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 11 Dec 2019 at 01:03, Romain Manni-Bucau <
> > > > >>>>> rmannibu...@gmail.com
> > > > >>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> I proposed some time ago to rename them all but since
> > jakarta
> > > > is
> > > > >>>>> at
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> eclipse
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> now, i guess well more move to their bundles.
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Wdyt?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Le mar. 10 déc. 2019 à 18:18, Maxim Solodovnik <
> > > > >>>>> solomax...@gmail.com>
> > > > >>>>>>>> a
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>> écrit :
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> not sure which list should I ask, so will start here
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> I have started to add module-info to our project
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The issue I found is:
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> openjpa depends on "Apache Geronimo JPA Spec 2.2"
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> geronimo jpa doesn't have automatic module name and
> > > > >>>>> automatically
> > > > >>>>>>>> being
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> resolved as
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> geronimo.jpa.2.2.spec
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Which is invalid java identifier :(((
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe it would be possible to release same artifact with
> > some
> > > > >>>>> correct
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> module name for ex. `geronimo.jpa_2_2.spec` and with
> > > > >>>>> incremented micro
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> version?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Or maybe there are other options I\, not aware of?
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> WBR
> > > > >>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>>
> > > > >>>>>> --
> > > > >>>>>> WBR
> > > > >>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>>> --
> > > > >>>>> WBR
> > > > >>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >>>>>
> > > > >>>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> WBR
> > > > >> Maxim aka solomax
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > WBR
> > > > > Maxim aka solomax
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > WBR
> > Maxim aka solomax
> >



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to