Thanks John. Now, hearing from Chris and Cameron would be nice.
Tim John R. Frank wrote: > First, unless someone objects, I'll commit this patch to the document. > These two erroneous words ("three" and "available") should have been > deleted earlier. > > Index: sponsoring > =================================================================== > --- sponsoring (revision 8317) > +++ sponsoring (working copy) > @@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ > Goals of Sponsorship > -------------------- > > -The OpenLayers community has established three high-level goals for > +The OpenLayers community has established high-level goals for > the use of funds from sponsors. The PSC votes periodically to > allocate funds according to these priorities. The PSC also > periodically votes to revise these priorities. > @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ > 3) Expand the number of people contributing functionality and > improvements to the OpenLayers code base. > > -4) Make OpenLayers a more useful web mapping toolkit available by > +4) Make OpenLayers a more useful web mapping toolkit by > enhancing the library. > > > > > > Second, to Eric's point: > >> Platinum sponsors may also have their logo placed directly on the >> OpenLayers home page. > > > When we get platinum level sponsors, putting logos on the homepage seems > quite appropriate to me. A sponsor at that level could reasonably ask for > lots of other recognition, and we'd probably hunt for ways to say thanks. > > > > Third, I'm +1 on this document and would like to see hear some facts and > spirited debate about pros and cons of different banking options. Then, > we can get to the real work of seeking sponsors. > > > > John > _______________________________________________ > Dev mailing list > Dev@openlayers.org > http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev -- Tim Schaub OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev