On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:21:14AM +0100, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S wrote: > It sounds like a great idea, and it actually works for Python. > > However, since OpenLayers extensively use subclassing, won't this be > a problem, if one were to make WFS3 it might be required to also make > Layer3, Grid3, etc?
It might. If so, so be it, as far as I'm concerned. > I can also see that the Map and Layer classes are tightly coupled, so I > forsee trouble there. Will there be extra development to allow a Map3 to > support a Layer, and vice versa for Layer3 and Map? Not in my opinin -- this falls into the "We might not generate alternatives for everything" category. If we need a new map, and the layers need to behave differently, only updated layers will work (in the same way only updated controls will work with newe vector layers, for example). Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt MetaCarta _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
