Hey- Christopher Schmidt wrote: > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Trond Michelsen wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 07:45:01AM -0500, Christopher Schmidt wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:21:14AM +0100, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S >>> wrote: >>>> However, since OpenLayers extensively use subclassing, won't this be >>>> a problem, if one were to make WFS3 it might be required to also make >>>> Layer3, Grid3, etc? >>> It might. If so, so be it, as far as I'm concerned. >> Wouldnt it be simpler to use OpenLayers3 as the base namespace instead?
Yeah, I see it as a lot of extra effort to have one library that can do both 2 and 3. It is easy to include extra scripts in a page. And we could easily keep 3 development in an OL3 namespace or something similar. If there is someone who wants to make a release in the 2.x series that allows people to try out 3.x stuff, then there would certainly be plenty of work to keep them busy. This is not necessarily something I am personally interested in spending time on. Tim > > A perfectly sane suggestion. This is why I send things to the mailing > list instead of doing them on my own :) > > Regards, -- Tim Schaub OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org Expert service straight from the developers. _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
