On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:44:21AM -0700, Tim Schaub wrote: > Hey- > > Christopher Schmidt wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Trond Michelsen wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 07:45:01AM -0500, Christopher Schmidt wrote: > >>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 09:21:14AM +0100, Kenneth Skovhede, GEOGRAF A/S > >>> wrote: > >>>> However, since OpenLayers extensively use subclassing, won't this be > >>>> a problem, if one were to make WFS3 it might be required to also make > >>>> Layer3, Grid3, etc? > >>> It might. If so, so be it, as far as I'm concerned. > >> Wouldnt it be simpler to use OpenLayers3 as the base namespace instead? > > Yeah, I see it as a lot of extra effort to have one library that can do > both 2 and 3. It is easy to include extra scripts in a page. And we > could easily keep 3 development in an OL3 namespace or something similar.
Okay, it seems like my previous emails did not make clear my concerns. I'll try again sometime over the thanksgiving break, I suppose. Thanks, -- Christopher Schmidt MetaCarta _______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@openlayers.org http://openlayers.org/mailman/listinfo/dev
