Reminder: proposal submission deadline is tomorrow WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos) On Mar 24, 2016 08:33, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ankush, > > sounds good. Some of the details we might discuss more at a later stage. > > Maybe we can get rid of any manual sync action a user would need to do. > That might be more good for testing purpose. > > As for the libraries, please review our current stack. If we already using > iCal4j we would probably prefer to keep using one library. > > Anyhow, those are details we can discuss once the proposal is approved. > > Just one formal note: You would not use the word "aim" in english. It's a > goal, like "Project goals". Aim is a word you would use in a different > context. > And also normally you would include at least 1 sentence around the overall > context of this project. Something like "The project will add xyz to Apache > Openmeetings. *OpenMeetings is a Web-Conferencing and collaboration > software which already has a Calendar*. But it doesn't integrate with > CalDev yet. ... the rest of your details ... ". > You have to imagine some Google guy reading this thing, he won't know what > OpenMeetings is, maybe not even be a person with an engineering background. > > Please ping the mailing list once your application is submitted to the > Google website. > > Thanks, > Sebastian > > > 2016-03-24 15:24 GMT+13:00 Ankush Mishra <[email protected]>: > > > Also, one another thing I forgot to mention was that, (this is optional, > > not sure if it's necessary) we can implement an updation of calendars at > > intervals of time, which could be set by the user. > > > > Ankush Mishra > > > > PS: I forgot to CC the mailing list for the previous email. > > On 24 Mar 2016 07:44, "Ankush Mishra" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> Hey, Sebastian > >> > >> Thanks for the response and also mentioning that issue, I forgot about > >> adding that part in. Might as well explain it now, I'm thinking of two > ways > >> which I am going to implement this on the user side: > >> > >> - Whenever the user visits the webpage there's going to be a recheck of > >> the sync-token or the ctag of the calendar, if they it's different from > the > >> previous token/tag we are going to sync. > >> - We also add a Sync/Reload Button to have the ability for the user to > >> manually reload the calendars. > >> > >> On the backend, there are again two ways, out of which one is deprecated > >> but still supported. > >> > >> - Using Calendar Collection Tag (Now deprecated by RFC6578) > >> - Using RFC6578 which defines the WEBDAV sync specification. > >> > >> Also, one thing I'll most likely change in my proposal is to add the > >> usage of jackrabbit-webdav and iCal4j aping with CalDAV4j. > >> > >> To answer your last question, I'll be only giving this one proposal for > >> GSoC 2016. > >> > >> Much Thanks > >> Ankush Mishra > >> Hi Ankush, > >> > >> I think the proposal looks fine too me. I think the Google folks will > not > >> bother that much but for my personal interest I would like to know some > >> more technical details, for instance: What will trigger the > synchronisation > >> with CalDav ? > >> > >> A common problem is that you create a calendar entry in one application > >> and you want to see the event in some other calendar. What and when will > >> the event be synchronised ? > >> > >> Please keep in mind that you have to submit your application by this > week. > >> Do you only submit this one application or are you submitting to > multiple > >> projects? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Sebastian > >> > >> > >> 2016-03-23 13:54 GMT+13:00 Ankush Mishra <[email protected]>: > >> > >>> No problems, looking forward to it. > >>> > >>> Ankush Mishra > >>> On 23 Mar 2016 01:56, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Ankush, > >>>> > >>>> will do later today (New Zealand Daylight time zone for me ;)) > >>>> > >>>> I will ping you later > >>>> > >>>> thx > >>>> Sebastian > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> 2016-03-23 5:00 GMT+13:00 Ankush Mishra <[email protected]>: > >>>> > >>>> > Looks like I sent it from a different email address. Apologies for > >>>> that. > >>>> > > >>>> > Ankush Mishra > >>>> > On 22 Mar 2016 21:27, "The Antimist" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > > >>>> > > Hey, Sebastian > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Is it possible for you to review my Proposal as well? > >>>> > > > >>>> > > My proposal can be found here: > >>>> > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/s5vnf6ctmdys7jb/proposal.pdf?dl=0 > >>>> > > > >>>> > > Ankush Mishra > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Sebastian Wagner > >>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >>>> [email protected] > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> -- > >> Sebastian Wagner > >> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > >> [email protected] > >> > > > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > [email protected] >
