Hey Sebastian, Just letting you know that, I just finished submitting the Proposal to Google for Apache.
Much Thanks Ankush Mishra On 24 Mar 2016 16:31, "Ankush Mishra" <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > Thanks for letting me know, I'll modify the proposal and submit it for > Approval. > > Ankush Mishra > Hi Ankush, > > sounds good. Some of the details we might discuss more at a later stage. > > Maybe we can get rid of any manual sync action a user would need to do. > That might be more good for testing purpose. > > As for the libraries, please review our current stack. If we already using > iCal4j we would probably prefer to keep using one library. > > Anyhow, those are details we can discuss once the proposal is approved. > > Just one formal note: You would not use the word "aim" in english. It's a > goal, like "Project goals". Aim is a word you would use in a different > context. > And also normally you would include at least 1 sentence around the overall > context of this project. Something like "The project will add xyz to Apache > Openmeetings. *OpenMeetings is a Web-Conferencing and collaboration > software which already has a Calendar*. But it doesn't integrate with > CalDev yet. ... the rest of your details ... ". > You have to imagine some Google guy reading this thing, he won't know what > OpenMeetings is, maybe not even be a person with an engineering background. > > Please ping the mailing list once your application is submitted to the > Google website. > > Thanks, > Sebastian > > > 2016-03-24 15:24 GMT+13:00 Ankush Mishra <[email protected]>: > >> Also, one another thing I forgot to mention was that, (this is optional, >> not sure if it's necessary) we can implement an updation of calendars at >> intervals of time, which could be set by the user. >> >> Ankush Mishra >> >> PS: I forgot to CC the mailing list for the previous email. >> On 24 Mar 2016 07:44, "Ankush Mishra" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hey, Sebastian >>> >>> Thanks for the response and also mentioning that issue, I forgot about >>> adding that part in. Might as well explain it now, I'm thinking of two ways >>> which I am going to implement this on the user side: >>> >>> - Whenever the user visits the webpage there's going to be a recheck of >>> the sync-token or the ctag of the calendar, if they it's different from the >>> previous token/tag we are going to sync. >>> - We also add a Sync/Reload Button to have the ability for the user to >>> manually reload the calendars. >>> >>> On the backend, there are again two ways, out of which one is deprecated >>> but still supported. >>> >>> - Using Calendar Collection Tag (Now deprecated by RFC6578) >>> - Using RFC6578 which defines the WEBDAV sync specification. >>> >>> Also, one thing I'll most likely change in my proposal is to add the >>> usage of jackrabbit-webdav and iCal4j aping with CalDAV4j. >>> >>> To answer your last question, I'll be only giving this one proposal for >>> GSoC 2016. >>> >>> Much Thanks >>> Ankush Mishra >>> Hi Ankush, >>> >>> I think the proposal looks fine too me. I think the Google folks will >>> not bother that much but for my personal interest I would like to know some >>> more technical details, for instance: What will trigger the synchronisation >>> with CalDav ? >>> >>> A common problem is that you create a calendar entry in one application >>> and you want to see the event in some other calendar. What and when will >>> the event be synchronised ? >>> >>> Please keep in mind that you have to submit your application by this >>> week. >>> Do you only submit this one application or are you submitting to >>> multiple projects? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Sebastian >>> >>> >>> 2016-03-23 13:54 GMT+13:00 Ankush Mishra <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> No problems, looking forward to it. >>>> >>>> Ankush Mishra >>>> On 23 Mar 2016 01:56, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Ankush, >>>>> >>>>> will do later today (New Zealand Daylight time zone for me ;)) >>>>> >>>>> I will ping you later >>>>> >>>>> thx >>>>> Sebastian >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2016-03-23 5:00 GMT+13:00 Ankush Mishra <[email protected]>: >>>>> >>>>> > Looks like I sent it from a different email address. Apologies for >>>>> that. >>>>> > >>>>> > Ankush Mishra >>>>> > On 22 Mar 2016 21:27, "The Antimist" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > > Hey, Sebastian >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Is it possible for you to review my Proposal as well? >>>>> > > >>>>> > > My proposal can be found here: >>>>> > > https://www.dropbox.com/s/s5vnf6ctmdys7jb/proposal.pdf?dl=0 >>>>> > > >>>>> > > Ankush Mishra >>>>> > > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Sebastian Wagner >>>>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Sebastian Wagner >>> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock >>> [email protected] >>> >> > > > -- > Sebastian Wagner > https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock > [email protected] >
