I see addresshierarchy and serialization.xstream in the releases repository. (xstream is then duplicated in the 3rd party too).
I'd prefer we leave the releases for openmrs core files. Some modules are considered to be authored and maintained by openmrs, but those might come and go. I this we should just put all of them in the same place: 3rd party. Ben On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Mark Goodrich <[email protected]> wrote: > Is there a reason most of the module jars are being deployed to the > “3rdparty” repo instead of the “releases” repo? > **** > > ** ** > > If we do want them in the 3rd party repo, we should update this > documentation accordingly:**** > > ** ** > > https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/docs/Managing+the+Maven+Repository**** > > ** ** > > Thanks, > Mark**** > > ** ** > > ** ** > ------------------------------ > Click here to > unsubscribe<[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l>from > OpenMRS Developers' mailing list _________________________________________ To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to [email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the body (not the subject) of your e-mail. [mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]
