I feel this is pretty good and kind of aligns with our SVN (and
perhaps GitHub) model. As far as I know Ben you should be able to just
create the repository via the UI.

Michael

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Ben Wolfe <[email protected]> wrote:
> If its easy to do, then yes, I think adding a "modules" repo seems the most
> correct.  Any reason not to do that?  Do we need an ITSM ticket for that?
>
> "modules" - all omod files: openmrs supported, volunteer supported,
> mavenized, or unmavenized
> "releases" - openmrs core jar and war files
> "3rd party" - all non-mavenized libraries we need to host somewhere (old
> versions of liquibase, customized hibernate, etc)
>
> The automatic push from module.openmrs.org repository to the nexus maven
> repo is a good project to list here:
> https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/projects/Unassigned+Projects  (This project
> would be easy with our current custom repo, not sure how possible if we
> switch to something mainstream)
>
> Ben
>
>
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Mark Goodrich <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> I would support a modules peer to releases. I see the reasoning for
>> separating the two, but 3rd party doesn't seem quite accurate.
>> ________________________________
>> From: Michael Downey
>> Sent: 1/24/2012 8:07 AM
>>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [OPENMRS-DEV] maven module releases -- 3rd party repo vs
>> Releases repo
>>
>> Personally I see "releases" akin to our Sourceforge mirrors. Basically all
>> add-on modules are 3rd party developments, although the few core modules
>> owned by the core team could be debatable.
>>
>> The alternative could be creating a "modules" peer to "releases".
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> On Tuesday, January 24, 2012, Rowan Seymour <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > I say anything uploaded to modules.openmrs.org and mavenized should be
>> > automatically deployed to RELEASES.
>> > Do we actually need SNAPSHOT module artifacts?
>> >
>> > On 23 January 2012 19:04, Saptarshi Purkayastha <[email protected]>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> My votes:
>> >>  - I would like 3rd party to be used for those that are not mavenized
>> >> and do have source in the openmrs svn repository
>> >>  - I would like RELEASES for modules that have mavenized modules and
>> >> are released
>> >>  - I would like SNAPSHOT for modules that have mavenized modules but
>> >> are still under development
>> >> ---
>> >> Regards,
>> >> Saptarshi PURKAYASTHA
>> >>
>> >> My Tech Blog:  http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com
>> >> You Live by CHOICE, Not by CHANCE
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 23 January 2012 22:09, Ben Wolfe <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> I see addresshierarchy and serialization.xstream in the releases
>> >>> repository.  (xstream is then duplicated in the 3rd party too).
>> >>>
>> >>> I'd prefer we leave the releases for openmrs core files.  Some modules
>> >>> are considered to be authored and maintained by openmrs, but those might
>> >>> come and go.  I this we should just put all of them in the same place: 
>> >>> 3rd
>> >>> party.
>> >>>
>> >>> Ben
>> >>>
>> >>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Mark Goodrich <[email protected]>
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Is there a reason most of the module jars are being deployed to the
>> >>>> “3rd party” repo instead of the “releases” repo?
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> If we do want them in the 3rd party repo, we should update this
>> >>>> documentation accordingly:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/docs/Managing+the+Maven+Repository
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Thanks,
>> >>>> Mark
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> ________________________________
>> >>>> Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>> >>
>> >> ________________________________
>> >> Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Rowan Seymour
>> > tel: +250 783835665
>> > http://twitter.com/rowanseymour
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Michael Downey
>> OpenMRS Community Infrastructure Team
>> [email protected] - http://openmrs.org/
>> ________________________________
>> Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>> ________________________________
>> Click here to unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list
>
>



-- 

Best regards,

Michael Downey
OpenMRS Community Infrastructure Team
[email protected] - http://openmrs.org/

_________________________________________

To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to 
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not 
the subject) of your e-mail.

[mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

Reply via email to