I don't think we generally need SNAPSHOT module artifacts... that is just more 
where they should go if we do need them... perhaps for core modules at some 
point, etc...

Saptarshi's votes sound good to me... and having a automated deployment between 
the module.openmrs.org and RELEASES makes sense, though this can be a future 
feature.  The key thing is to set a module's pom so that when you do a mvn 
deploy it sends it to RELEASES.

Mark
________________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] On Behalf Of Rowan Seymour 
[[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2012 1:22 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OPENMRS-DEV] maven module releases -- 3rd party repo vs Releases 
repo

I say anything uploaded to modules.openmrs.org and mavenized should be 
automatically deployed to RELEASES.

Do we actually need SNAPSHOT module artifacts?

On 23 January 2012 19:04, Saptarshi Purkayastha 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
My votes:
 - I would like 3rd party to be used for those that are not mavenized and do 
have source in the openmrs svn repository
 - I would like RELEASES for modules that have mavenized modules and are 
released
 - I would like SNAPSHOT for modules that have mavenized modules but are still 
under development

---
Regards,
Saptarshi PURKAYASTHA

My Tech Blog:  http://sunnytalkstech.blogspot.com
You Live by CHOICE, Not by CHANCE



On 23 January 2012 22:09, Ben Wolfe <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> 
wrote:
I see addresshierarchy and serialization.xstream in the releases repository.  
(xstream is then duplicated in the 3rd party too).

I'd prefer we leave the releases for openmrs core files.  Some modules are 
considered to be authored and maintained by openmrs, but those might come and 
go.  I this we should just put all of them in the same place: 3rd party.

Ben

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:35 AM, Mark Goodrich 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Is there a reason most of the module jars are being deployed to the “3rd party” 
repo instead of the “releases” repo?

If we do want them in the 3rd party repo, we should update this documentation 
accordingly:

https://wiki.openmrs.org/display/docs/Managing+the+Maven+Repository

Thanks,
Mark


________________________________
Click here to 
unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l> 
from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list


________________________________
Click here to 
unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l> 
from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list



--
Rowan Seymour
tel: +250 783835665
http://twitter.com/rowanseymour

________________________________
Click here to 
unsubscribe<mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l> 
from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list

_________________________________________

To unsubscribe from OpenMRS Developers' mailing list, send an e-mail to 
[email protected] with "SIGNOFF openmrs-devel-l" in the  body (not 
the subject) of your e-mail.

[mailto:[email protected]?body=SIGNOFF%20openmrs-devel-l]

Reply via email to