On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 18:09 +0200, Aliaksandr Autayeu wrote:
> P.S. On convenience. Cloning into single directory and setting up
> single
> project makes it works just as well. Decent IDEs handle this easily.
> 
> On tracking history. The need to track history of experimental code
> obfuscates its poor documentation. If the code if properly documented
> (including documenting design decisions), there is no need to search
> history. Moreover, if experimental code changed approach or algorithm
> radically (with reasons that should be documented), the history might
> confuse more than clarify.
> 
> Modulo tracking history, multiple modular repos are more flexible
> than one
> jumbo repo.

We are an Open Source project and for IP issues it is important to be
able to see where contributions to our code base came from. Maybe the
history is not helpful in all cases, but it is still nice to have it.

Anyway, even if we remove folders from one of the other repositories
the history there will remain forever. In the case it has to be
accessed it will be there.

Jörn

Reply via email to