On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:57:11 -0500
Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote:

<snip>

> OK.  See if the revised answer is good.

Revised text is very good.


<snip
> 
> Is there anything in the current text that suggests blame?

No, Rob, there is not, nor was there; I'm sorry if it was picked up so.  My 
comment was intended as general policy that we should not attribute blame in 
any direction; I think we are all well aware how any such might be picked up by 
pro-active supporters of other office suites and a seemingly innocent statement 
of fact escalated into a vicious slanging match, with increasing ill-feeling on 
both sides.  If the AOO project is to proceed (and hopefully, heal historic 
breaches) I think we all need to be careful to avoid adverse criticism of 
others involved in another but similar project.


-- 
Rory O'Farrell <[email protected]>

Reply via email to