Le 10/02/2013 21:21, Rob Weir a écrit :
Did you not notice the title of this thread? Has it entirely escaped you that we're talking about 0^0 here? If you want to start another threat about extensions, then go ahead and I will comment there. But anyone of the intelligence of a grapefruit would not find it strange that I am discussing only 0^0 in this thread.
And have you read my previous message? I don't understand why there is almost nothing aired when there are talks about breaking the compatibility of ALL the extensions because of a minor issue. And here you're challenging a change that will affect very few users. You told in your first message that you were concerned that the change would break the backward compatibility. But are you not concerned by all the users having their extensions deactivated by a minor API change??? There is your other message: Le 09/02/2013 18:40, Rob Weir a écrit :
I've added a new section to the 4.0 Release Notes for tracking changes that impact backwards compatibility: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+Release+Notes This would include changes to the public interfaces of AOO, including incompatible changes to API's (including spreadsheet functions), file formats, etc.
But I don't see any reference to the extensions issue. If there is a real problem to be talked about, it's more the API change that would break extensions compatibility. Honestly, I don't care about the 0^0 issue. Not enough users will be impacted. Hagar
